Active is: Anticipating what’s ahead

Emerging markets need foreign investment as coronavirus spreads and capital flows out

Emerging markets need foreign investment as coronavirus spreads and capital flows out


Even as the developed world slowly comes to grips with the coronavirus outbreak, the struggle in emerging markets is just beginning, and many foreign investors have grown wary. Social distancing and other containment measures are creating significant risks to EM economies. Still, some countries – including Russia, Brazil and China – could be set to rebound when capital begins flowing back in.

Key takeaways

  • Emerging markets are experiencing a humanitarian crisis that could overwhelm their healthcare systems, but they must focus on limiting economic damage as well
  • EMs can enact monetary and fiscal policy changes that provide liquidity and reduce financial risks, though they can’t protect against supply and demand shocks
  • EM countries rely heavily on foreign-denominated debt, which creates significant liquidity and solvency risk and leaves EMs exposed to sudden shifts in global risk appetites
  • EM debt investors may want to be wary of Turkey, the Middle East and Africa, but Russia and Brazil could be better positioned to pay their debt obligations
  • EM equity valuations are far below their historical average – which implies attractive long-term investment opportunities

Emerging markets are battling coronavirus as foreign investors pull capital

In response to the coronavirus pandemic, many emerging market (EM) countries are implementing national lockdowns that are having dramatic effects on their citizens and economies. The virus is also threatening to overwhelm EM healthcare systems, many of which are more fragile than those of developed nations. All this is worrying foreign investors, who helped support a public and private borrowing boom during the last decade. As the accompanying chart shows, foreign capital outflows from the coronavirus crisis are even more pronounced than the ones triggered by previous crises.

Coronavirus has already triggered bigger investment outflows than other crises
Accumulated non-resident portfolio flows to EMs since indicated date (USD bn)

Chart: Coronavirus has already triggered bigger investment outflows than other crises

Source: International Institute of Finance (IIF), AllianzGI Global Economics & Strategy. Data as at April 2020.

This is putting significant pressure on the balance of payment – the amount of money flowing in and out of countries – and is likely leading to a significant drawdown of the foreign exchange reserves that EM countries hold. (Positive capital flows coming into EM countries provide vital amounts of foreign currencies, particularly US dollars.)

Moreover, years of “loose” monetary policy (including low interest rates) have lifted public and private debt levels in EMs – particularly in China. According to April 2020 data from the Bank for International Settlements, US dollar-denominated debt for all EMs (including China) is close to USD 4 trillion, and the ratio of government debt to GDP for all EMs (excluding China) is at the highest level in decades. In addition, many EM countries are paying more just to service this debt. Approximately USD 730 billion in EM debt needs to be refinanced in 2020, according to the International Institute of Finance, and more than 80% of it is in US dollars. Relying so much on foreign-denominated debt creates significant liquidity and solvency risk for many EM companies and governments, while leaving them more exposed to sudden shifts in global risk appetites.

So even as EM countries are battling a historic pandemic and searching for ways to extend a significant financial lifeline to businesses and families, they also need to find new sources of external funding. This creates opportunities for foreign investors, although it’s important to be active and selective in choosing where to invest.

Fortunately, outside support from major institutions is already on the way – including nearly USD 1 trillion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, this is just a portion of the USD 2.5 trillion that the IMF says is needed to stabilise EM economies. More than 90 of the IMF’s 189 members have asked for financial assistance since the start of the coronavirus outbreak – the largest number of such requests in the 75-year history of the IMF.

Significant fiscal and monetary policy coordination needed to mitigate the damage

For EM economies to recover, there must not only be effective efforts to contain the virus, but fiscal and monetary policies that limit lasting economic damage. So far, EM countries have launched sizable policy responses, though the extent varies significantly across countries. For example:

  • Brazil announced a comprehensive fiscal package worth around 3.6% of GDP.
  • Chile approved an even bigger fiscal stimulus package, at 4.8% of GDP.
  • Poland announced fiscal stimulus measures totalling 9% of GDP.
  • Indonesia says it will breach previous fiscal spending limits and allow the deficit to rise to 5% of GDP.
  • For comparison purposes, the US has adopted spending packages equivalent to 8.3% of GDP, plus additional guarantees and loans worth 2.4% of GDP. But the European Union is outspending them all, recently announcing fiscal packages (including loans and guarantees) worth almost 21% of GDP.

Central bank monetary policy in EMs is the most expansionary of the last 15 years, with EMs cutting interest rates more than 20 times in March 2020 alone, according to our research. In addition, EM central banks from Poland to South Africa are implementing the kind of unconventional monetary policy measures that industrial countries have been using for years. While monetary policy cannot do much to buffer supply and demand shocks, it still plays an important role by providing liquidity to companies and reducing financial risks.

Considerations for investors

  • We can’t predict the impact of the coronavirus on EM economies, but risks seem to be rising.
  • The most immediate impact has been felt in the services sector, but also in manufacturing as containment measures shut down industrial activity and disrupted global value chains.
  • EM debt investors should be wary of countries that are more dependent on external capital. For example, Turkey needs to refinance large amounts of foreign-currency debt, and countries in the Middle East and Africa (many of which are large oil exporters) have currencies pegged to those of developed nations. Instead, consider focusing on countries (such as Russia and Brazil) that are better able to pay their US dollar sovereign obligations, despite the sharp weakening of their currencies relative to other emerging markets.
  • Capital outflows and widespread risk-aversion have made equity valuations more reasonable. EM equities are trading at a cyclically adjusted price-earnings ratio (CAPE) – our preferred way of valuing equities – that is far below historical averages. This implies that investors should be able to find attractive long-term values.
  • Active investors can find good opportunities to be selective in EM countries as the world combats the coronavirus. While overall EM investment outflows will likely continue, the pace may slow or even reverse in some cases. For example, China’s equity market has attracted almost USD 10 billion of net fund inflows since the beginning of March 2020, according to fund flow data provider EPFR. However, it’s hard to assess whether this is temporary or part of a larger trend. But if there is a global economic recovery in the second half of the year, the outlook for emerging markets would likely improve as well.


About the author

Stefan Scheurer

Stefan Scheurer

Senior Investment Strategist

Stefan Scheurer joined Allianz Global Investors in 2008 and is Director, Global Capital Markets & Thematic Research. The focus of his work is on analysis relating to strategic and tactical allocations, specific investment opportunities and the identification of long-term investment trends.

Active is: Keeping sustainability front and centre

Five ways the coronavirus could change how we think about sustainability

Five ways the coronavirus could change how we think about sustainability


The coronavirus pandemic has highlighted core sustainability issues such as income inequality, poor healthcare and complex supply chains. As a result, sustainability is likely to become increasingly integral to asset managers’ investment processes and risk analysis. Here are five ways we think the crisis will affect investors.

Key takeaways

  • Increased public demand for adequate healthcare is likely to overcome concerns about high costs, leading to widespread changes to healthcare models
  • Disruption to global trade may lead to greater focus on local communities and shorter, more controllable supply chains
  • Companies that take proactive steps to support their customers and employees during the pandemic should benefit when the crisis fades
  • Any backsliding on the progress already seen on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues – particularly the environment and climate change – will be short-lived
  • Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

    The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.

    This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is used only as supporting material to the offshore investment products offered by commercial banks under the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations. This document does not constitute a public offer by virtue of Act Number 26.831 of the Argentine Republic and General Resolution No. 622/2013 of the NSC. This communication's sole purpose is to inform and does not under any circumstance constitute promotion or publicity of Allianz Global Investors products and/or services in Colombia or to Colombian residents pursuant to part 4 of Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication does not in any way aim to directly or indirectly initiate the purchase of a product or the provision of a service offered by Allianz Global Investors. Via reception of his document, each resident in Colombia acknowledges and accepts to have contacted Allianz Global Investors via their own initiative and that the communication under no circumstances does not arise from any promotional or marketing activities carried out by Allianz Global Investors. Colombian residents accept that accessing any type of social network page of Allianz Global Investors is done under their own responsibility and initiative and are aware that they may access specific information on the products and services of Allianz Global Investors. This communication is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced. This communication does not constitute a public offer of securities in Colombia pursuant to the public offer regulation set forth in Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication and the information provided herein should not be considered a solicitation or an offer by Allianz Global Investors or its affiliates to provide any financial products in Brazil, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional/professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP (Australian Registered Body Number 160 464 200) is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws.

    This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, distributor registered with FINRA, is affiliated with Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC; Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG; Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424, Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and Investment Trust Association, Japan]; and Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan.