What could lie ahead for economies and markets: strength and vulnerability

by Steven Malin | 21/06/2018
Stacking wooden blocks game of balance


Based on a mix of supportive economic policies and positive market conditions, the second half of 2018 seems to be positioned for growth in the United States. But acceleration is never a sure thing despite what may appear to be an environment ripe for spending.

Key takeaways

  • A US recession does not appear to be imminent, but an array of developments could lead to a premature cyclical slowdown recession and unexpectedly slow real economic growth.
  • Perhaps above all else, the key to the US economic outlook rests with the expected pace of capital spending and its effect on productivity, wages and the GDP.
  • No matter how trade relations play out over the years ahead, a complicated and extensive flow of goods, services, resources and intellectual property will continue.

US economic growth appears to be poised to accelerate in the second half of 2018, but the end of the economic cycle may be closer than anticipated by the consensus forecast. A pro-growth mix of economic policies has set conditions conducive to more rapid increases in consumer spending, business investment and labour compensation. Consumer spending is brisk and measures of business optimism seem to break records every month.

Capital spending plans
Investment plans have improved markedly since mid-2016

Investment plans have improved markedly since mid-2016

Sources: Morgan Stanley Research; Allianz Global Investors. Data as at 29 May 2018.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Looking ahead to the second half of 2018, however, these outcomes cannot be assured despite their great promise. Households and businesses may well rethink their spending plans over the months ahead as they soberly evaluate the meaning of tax changes, government spending, economic policy adjustments and new risks to their well-being. If capital expenditures by businesses go to unproductive investment, productivity fails to accelerate and inflation-adjusted workers’ compensation does not increase, real economic growth could languish.

To be sure, Federal Reserve monetary policymakers will continue to base their interest-rate decisions on the flow of inflation, wage and labour market data. Yet how the Fed implements monetary policy over the next couple of years may be at least as important as the timing and magnitude of its policy decisions. Analysts to whom the Fed pays attention recommend that policy adjustments should focus increasingly on balance-sheet normalisation rather than policy-rate increases. A revised approach would hasten shrinkage of the Fed’s holdings of mortgage-backed securities with an eye towards their elimination within just a few years. Doing so would add precision and flexibility to policy implementation while also extricating the central bank from political pressures and a de facto fiscal policy role.

Nonetheless, if the Fed continues to make increases in policy interest rates the focal point of monetary policy implementation, fixed-income investors may have something to cheer. The reason is simple: over time, yield, not the change in yield, drives returns. Therefore, as rates rise, the total return to fixed-income securities tends to rise, not fall, with them.

Meanwhile, Congress and President Donald Trump's administration continue to implement a pro-business fiscal mix while also skirting around the letter and the intent of the legislated federal budget process. Fiscal policy likely will continue to reflect fractious political posturing devoid of critical details rather than well-reasoned, thoroughly debated bills. Henceforth, overall outlay and revenue decisions can be expected to take place in broad strokes of political expediency and with little regard for details. The appropriations process legislated into law in 1974 may well be defunct.

While the economic policy-making processes twist and turn, the interconnectedness of the US economy to others remains intricate and deep. Even as trade relations deteriorate, the forces of globalisation and technological revolution promise to defeat the forces of nationalism, populism and withdrawal from multilateral arrangements. Even if US-China and US-EU trade relations play out acrimoniously over the years ahead, for example, a complicated and extensive flow of goods, services, resources and intellectual property between the two nations will continue based, for the time being, on a co-dependency built up over the last three decades. In an interconnected world, developments anywhere can reverberate in anyone’s hometown.

Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted. This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is used only as supporting material to the offshore investment products offered by commercial banks under the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations. This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424, Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and Investment Trust Association, Japan];and Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan.


About the author

Steven Malin

Steven Malin

Senior Investment Strategist

Mr. Malin is a senior investment strategist and a director with Allianz Global Investors, which he joined in 2013. As a member of the Global Economics & Strategy team, he is responsible for making weekly global asset allocation and strategy recommendations; he also briefs clients internationally on the firm’s market outlook. Mr. Malin’s white paper series, Under the Macroscope, has a global following among business, financial, central bank and government leaders. He has 27 years of financial-markets, central-bank and investment-industry experience. Earlier in his career, Mr. Malin was a senior portfolio manager at AllianceBernstein, serving institutional, sub-advisory, Taft-Hartley and private clients throughout North America. He also worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, reporting directly to the Bank’s presidents while serving as vice president in the communications group, corporate secretary and senior economist. Before that, Mr. Malin was the senior economist, founder and director of the regional economics center at The Conference Board; during that time he led a private economics consulting practice that included 25 Fortune 500 companies, trade associations and pension plans. He also served on the National Commission on Competitiveness, National Commission on US-Japan Economic Complementarity, Southern Growth Policies Board Economics Committee and the Corporate Advisory Board to the New York State Assembly Ways & Means Committee. Mr. Malin was an advisor to the Governors of Arkansas, Virginia and Montana on economic development and tourism. He also taught macroeconomics and risk-management courses at Barnard College-Columbia University and the City University of New York. He has a B.A. in economics from Queens College and a Ph.D. in economics from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.

3 key themes to shape the remainder of the year

by Mona Mahajan | 27/07/2018
Three themes for the second half of 2018


Three factors appear likely to shape the US economy through the rest of 2018: trade tensions, mid-term elections and the Fed’s road to normalisation. In a late-cycle environment marked by the potential for tail risks, investors should take a closer look at small caps, energy, high yield and alternatives.

Key takeaways

  • Equities aren’t the only US asset class performing well in 2018: the dollar, high-yield bonds, Treasuries and small caps have also been positive
  • Trade tensions have increased global uncertainty, but we believe China isn’t inclined to escalate matters or retaliate much further
  • We see the potential for a strong year-end in the US; historically, the period after mid-term elections has been robust for the markets as uncertainty is lifted
  • Looking ahead to 2019, tail risks could emerge; we encourage investors to remain diversified and active, and to consider increasing exposure to uncorrelated assets