The Age of AI Disruption

The next trillion-dollar IPOs are coming – are markets ready?

The next wave of mega IPOs could bring some of the most influential private companies of the past decade into public markets at unprecedented scale. At the centre of structural themes such as artificial intelligence (AI) and space, these companies mark a shift in the opportunity set for investors – less a supply shock, more a shift in who markets can own.

The next initial public offering (IPO) wave could mark the moment when some of the most influential private companies of the past decade finally enter public markets – at a scale those markets rarely see. SpaceX is expected to list on 12 June, with OpenAI and Anthropic likely to follow over the coming quarters.1 Taken together, this would represent one of the largest bursts of equity issuance in recent memory.

These are not typical IPO candidates. They sit at the centre of two of the most powerful themes in markets today: artificial AI and the commercialisation of space – with the AI theme continuing to broaden rather than fading. They are already operating at a scale where, once listed, they could rival some of the world’s largest public companies. For investors, the key question is how markets absorb assets of this size as they move from private to public hands.

From hype to absorption dynamics – the key question for markets

In recent years, equity markets – particularly in the US – have been supported by a favourable supply-demand dynamic, with robust share buybacks offsetting limited new issuance. The arrival of several very large IPOs could shift that balance, although we think this will result in reallocation rather than disruption.

How markets absorb these IPOs will depend on several factors: how much capital is actually raised, the speed at which freely tradable shares increase (particularly as lock-up periods expire, which affects index inclusion), and the overall level of equity inflows in the US during the issuance period – which could also be influenced by factors such as the upcoming US mid-term elections.

We estimate that three huge capital raisings over two to three quarters can be absorbed by markets, assuming there is no major change in investor sentiment and equity fund flows.

Once these companies enter major indices at meaningful weights, capital will be reallocated away from existing constituents as their weights decline. Index providers have already indicated that inclusion is likely to happen faster and with fewer conditions than in the past. Even sizeable capital raisings may prove manageable in this context. In fact, even if a very large company were added to an index, funds that track that index would likely have to sell around US 40 billion of Nvidia stock to make room for it – less than 1% of Nvidia’s total market value.2

Reallocation is likely, rather than disruption

So, while this is unlikely to be a disruptive “flood” of supply, it will still have meaningful impacts. As well as forcing index-tracking funds to rebalance, the IPO wave is likely to shift investor attention. Today, investors often gain exposure to themes like AI indirectly – via suppliers, partners or listed “proxies”. Once the core companies themselves become investable, that dynamic changes.

Capital and research focus may migrate toward the newly listed names, potentially challenging incumbents that previously benefited from “proxy premia”.

Timing is key for IPOs

History provides a useful reference point. IPO waves typically appear in strong markets, when investor enthusiasm is already high, often coinciding with elevated expectations.

History shows that outcomes for investors in large IPOs are mixed, particularly in the years following listing (see Exhibit 1). Companies like Alphabet went on to deliver exceptional long-term returns, while others – from Meta in its early years to more recent listings such as Uber or Rivian – struggled once the initial excitement faded.

Exhibit 1: IPO outcomes – tech firm listings have been the most lucrative in recent history

Source: Global Economics & Strategy, Anthropic Claude, LSEG Datastream

Much depends not just on the quality of the business, but on the market environment that follows. As the contrasting experiences of Visa and Blackstone, both listed ahead of the global financial crisis, demonstrate, timing and context can matter as much as fundamentals.

We also think that the expected valuation multiples for capital-intense, as-yet-unprofitable companies could increase the risk of post-IPO underperformance.

Opportunity meets reality

This IPO wave is distinguished by its size, but also by its strategic significance. For years, some of the most important companies driving innovation have remained private for longer, accessible only to venture capital or private equity investors. A listing opens the door to participation by a much broader investor base, particularly in areas like AI where listed options have so far been limited or indirect. However, this often coincides with favourable market conditions and strong investor appetite. For existing shareholders, it is a chance to crystallise value. For new investors, it can be a moment of entry where expectations are already high.

This pattern has played out before, but may be amplified here given the scale of capital required and the intensity of interest around AI.

Investors may also need to remember that despite the current once-in-a-generation AI capex supercycle, all companies are vulnerable to more down-to-earth cyclical trends, such as advertising cash flows. As long-duration growth stocks, they can also be exposed to a potential rise in US Federal Reserve policy rates and bond yields.

What to watch

As the timeline for these IPOs becomes clearer, a few factors will be critical in how smoothly the transition from private to public markets unfolds.

  • Pace of issuance – A staggered approach would reduce pressure on markets. A clustered wave would have more visible effects.
  • Interaction with market flows – Strong inflows into equities would make absorption easier; weaker demand would sharpen the impact.
  • Details that emerge as companies prepare to list – Specifics, particularly around governance, capital structure and strategic positioning, can determine success. These are often underappreciated drivers of how IPOs are ultimately received.

In summary, the next wave of mega IPOs is a test of how public markets absorb companies that have grown larger, stayed private longer, and sit closer to the centre of structural trends than ever before. Markets are likely to absorb them – but capital will be reallocated, attention will shift, and high expectations will be tested. This could challenge some of the “proxy” beneficiaries that have driven equity returns to date.

That creates both opportunity and risk – and will require investors to be selective as access to these themes becomes more direct.

1 Reuters, "Exclusive: SpaceX accelerates IPO timeline, targets June 12 listing on Nasdaq, sources say"; Associated Press, "AI companies are barreling toward huge Wall Street debuts. A look at the biggest players"
2 JP Morgan Equity Index Research Large Cap IPOs and Potential Index Inclusion, 11 May 2026

Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it may fall as well as rise and investors might not get back the full amount invested.

Past performance does not predict future returns. If the currency in which the past performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which the investor resides, then the investor should be aware that due to the exchange rate fluctuations the performance shown may be higher or lower if converted into the investor’s local currency.

This is for information only and not to be construed as a solicitation or an invitation to make an offer to buy or sell any securities. The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. The data used is derived from various sources and assumed to be accurate and reliable at the time of publication. but it has not been independently verified; its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from its use, unless caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted, except for the case of explicit permission by Allianz Global Investors.

This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities.


This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional/professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws; in the European Union, by Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungs-aufsicht (BaFin) and is authorized and regulated in South Africa by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority; in the UK, by Allianz Global Investors (UK) Ltd. company number 11516839, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA); in Switzerland, by Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG, authorised by the Swiss financial markets regulator (FINMA); in HK, by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore, by Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; in Japan, by Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424], Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association, the Investment Trust Association, Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; In mainland China, it is for Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations and is for information purpose only. in Taiwan, by Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan; and in Indonesia, by PT. Allianz Global Investors Asset Management Indonesia licensed by Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK); in the Abu Dhabi Global Market by Allianz Global Investors Middle East Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the ADGM Financial Services Regulatory Authority

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.