Active is: Navigating the US government shutdown

How long will the US government stay open?

by Mona Mahajan | 05/02/2019
How long will the US government stay open?

Summary

On the heels of a temporary deal to fund the government until 15 February, a bipartisan committee is working towards a resolution on border security. Elevated uncertainty is likely until a final agreement is reached.

Key takeaways

  • The S&P 500 Index returned 10.3% over the 35-day US government shutdown period – the best performance during a shutdown historically – but we will watch for any lingering negative impact on consumer and business confidence
  • If the shutdown’s impact on the US consumer is constrained, US economic growth remains near 2.5% and earnings growth stays near 4%-6%, we anticipate a positive, albeit modest, return environment in 2019
  • Against a tense domestic political backdrop, President Trump may be more inclined to get a “win” in trade, as he can execute this more unilaterally

After a five-week partial shutdown of the US government – the longest in history – President Donald Trump recently agreed on a temporary deal to re-open the government until 15 February.

This three-week reprieve means furloughed employees will receive back pay, and US government agencies should return to full operations. If history is an indicator, US economic growth will likely rebound once the government is opened again, although we will wait to see how the shutdown will affect consumer confidence and small-business optimism.

Economic effect

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the total cost of the shutdown over the 35-day period was USD 11 billion, including lost productivity, delayed spending and private-sector loss of business. However, as the accompanying chart shows, economic growth has typically rebounded after previous shutdowns ended, as employees receive back pay and government spending fully resumes. The estimated permanent loss is therefore lower – at USD 3 billion, or about 0.2 percentage points of GDP.

S&P 500 Index returns during and after historical US government shutdowns

Begin date End date Number of days Return during shutdown Return 6 months after shutdown Return 12 months after shutdown President Senate House
21/11/1981 22/11/1981 2 0.0% -5.6% 10.3% Reagan (R) Republican Democrat
1/10/1982 1/10/1982 1 0.0% 25.4% 36.2% Reagan (R) Republican Democrat
18/12/1982 20/12/1982 3 -0.9% 24.1% 18.9% Reagan (R) Republican Democrat
1/10/1984 2/10/1984 2 -0.6% 10.8% 12.5% Reagan (R) Republican Democrat
4/10/1984 4/10/1984 1 0.0% 9.9% 12.5% Reagan (R) Republican Democrat
17/10/1986 17/10/1986 1 0.0% 20.1% 18.4% Reagan (R) Republican Democrat
19/12/1987 19/12/1987 1 0.0% 8.6% 11.9% Reagan (R) Democrat Democrat
6/10/1990 8/10/1990 3 0.6% 19.7% 21.4% Bush (R) Democrat Democrat
14/11/1995 18/11/1995 5 1.8% 10.9% 22.8% Clinton (D) Republican Republican
16/12/1995 5/1/1996 21 0.1% 8.0% 21.3% Clinton (D) Republican Republican
1/10/2013 16/10/2013 16 1.6% 9.5% 8.2% Obama (D) Democrat Republican
20/1/2018 22/1/2018 3 0.8% -1.1% -7.0% Trump (R) Republican Republican
8/2/2018 9/2/2018 1 1.5% 8.9% 0.0% Trump (R) Republican Republican
22/12/2018 25/1/2019 35 10.3% - - Trump (R) Republican Rep/Dem (changed control)
Average   6.79 0.4% 11.5% 14.4%      

Source: Allianz Global Investors, Congressional Research Service. Data as at 25 January 2019.

We think the downside may ultimately be minimal if the government continues to function beyond 15 February. We could see GDP dip slightly below 2.0% in the first quarter and, depending on the lag effect of this rebound, we could see some positive spillover into the second quarter of this year, with GDP expected to be 2.4%. We will watch closely for any lingering negative impact on consumer and business confidence, which may have economic and market implications.

Beyond the wall

The 2019 political calendar is front-loaded with many key dates and events that will likely be affected in some way from the shutdown:

  • The Fed: The Federal Reserve held its first 2019 meeting on 30 January. Each meeting will now be accompanied by a press conference with Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Notably, investors will keep listening for any commentary from the Fed on the impact of the shutdown (on both growth and employment).
  • China/US trade negotiations: On 1 March, the 90-day “truce” in the US-China trade war is set to end. Despite recent comments from Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross on a deal being “miles and miles” apart, the pre-work for a final deal seems to be in motion. This includes a delegation from China visiting the US towards the end of January. Notably, President Trump was able to open the government ahead of this visit, which should help reduce political uncertainty in the US – particularly as the US and China continue negotiations on US soil.
  • A newly divided Congress: If the divisiveness we have seen over the five-week shutdown is any indication, odds seem lower that a divided Congress will compromise on new legislation such as infrastructure or health care.

Political fallout and implications

We remain cautiously optimistic in our base case that the US government will remain open after 15 February, and that the government will not shut down again. We believe that if President Trump is not satisfied with proposals from the Congressional budget committees, he will take unilateral executive action to make amends, including either re-appropriating funding from the defense budget for funding for a wall, or declaring a national emergency to fund the wall.

More broadly, the bitter divide between Democrats and Republicans grew more pronounced during this five-week shutdown period. When the new Congress was sworn in on 3 January, there were increased hopes for potential bipartisan deals around infrastructure and drug pricing, but we think this kind of compromise is now incrementally less likely. Both parties continue to seem reluctant to give the other a “win” as the 2020 presidential elections come to the fore.

Against this domestic political backdrop, we think it’s more likely that President Trump will be inclined to get a win in trade, since he can do this more unilaterally. An initial trade deal may be more focused on the US-China trade imbalance, while the more complex structural issues of intellectual property rights and technology-transfer practices may become part of later negotiations.

From an investor perspective, the urgency from the president and his administration to keep the US economy afloat and perhaps get a trade deal done – or at the very least not exacerbate the situation further – may provide a positive backdrop for risk assets. Depending on the ultimate economic effects of the shutdown – hopefully the impact on the US consumer will be constrained, US economic growth will remain near 2.5% and earnings growth will stay near 4%-6% – we anticipate a positive, albeit modest, return environment in 2019.

Further reading

To learn more about the history of US government shutdowns – and their economic impact – read Mona Mahajan’s full report: “US government shutdown: deal or no deal in three weeks?”



Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Bond prices will normally decline as interest rates rise. The impact may be greater with longer-duration bonds. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted. This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is used only as supporting material to the offshore investment products offered by commercial banks under the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations.

This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, distributor registered with FINRA, is affiliated with Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC; Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG, licensed by FINMA (www.finma.ch) for distribution and by OAKBV (Oberaufsichtskommission berufliche Vorsorge) for asset management related to occupational pensions in Switzerland; Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424, Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and Investment Trust Association, Japan]; and Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan.

729975

About the author

Mona Mahajan

Mona Mahajan

US Investment Strategist

Ms. Mahajan is the US investment strategist and a director with Allianz Global Investors, which she joined in 2017. As a member of the Global Economics and Strategy team, she is responsible for providing US retail and institutional clients with differentiated investment thought leadership. Ms. Mahajan is also a key spokesperson, communicating – both internally and externally – the firm’s high-conviction investment ideas and views from the Global Policy Council. Ms. Mahajan was previously a fixed-income portfolio manager, a structured-finance product specialist and a global market strategist at MetLife. Prior to this, she was an emerging-market strategist at Mirae Asset Global Investments; she also worked at hedge fund companies Para Advisors and Ziff Brothers Investments. Ms. Mahajan has a B.S. in economics from The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania; a B.A.Sc. in computer sciences from the University of Pennsylvania; and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Active is: Navigating geopolitics

What investors need to know as Brexit nears

07/02/2019
Man looking at London skyline

Summary

As the date of the UK’s planned exit from the EU approaches, there’s an increased probability the Prime Minister will win support for her Brexit deal. But a “no-deal” scenario cannot be ruled out – and it could have a heavy impact on the UK economy. Here’s what investors need to know to navigate markets.

Key takeaways

  • There’s a strong probability that Prime Minister May will get some version of her Brexit deal through Parliament at the next vote, though she will need to make the “backstop” more palatable to her party
  • A “no-deal” scenario is still possible, but headlines about the economic disruption from a Brexit crash-out may have further hardened minds against this outcome
  • If Mrs May gains a parliamentary majority for her withdrawal agreement, we think sterling would be positioned to appreciate, gilts would likely sell off and equities would rally after a brief initial drop
  • Given that any new agreement would merely set the scene for long negotiations about the future UK-EU relationship, uncertainty will persist; investors must prepare for a wide range of scenarios