US banks: five factors to watch after First Republic’s collapse
Three high-profile bank failures in two months have prompted investors to scrutinise the robustness of the overall US banking sector. In our view, the recent rescue of First Republic Bank should help allay the risk of contagion. But as other banks make the headlines, there might still be stress ahead – and we identify five factors to monitor in the months ahead, including a heightened risk of digital bank runs.
- The latest strains affecting US regional banks have intensified the spotlight on the health of the country’s banking sector.
- From the effects of lending headwinds to the scale of credit losses, we think there are five factors investors may watch for signs of further pressure.
- The stress has also highlighted how, in a digital age, guarding against the risk of bank runs is becoming increasingly difficult.
What has happened?
First Republic Bank was another recent casualty of stresses in the US banking sector following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank in March. After disclosing more than USD 100 billion in underlying outflows in the first quarter1, First Republic saw regulators step in and facilitate a sale of its assets to JP Morgan Chase & Co.2 It is the largest US bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis. In the days since the rescue, the shares of some other US regional banks have fallen.3
What does the future hold for the sector?
We think the sale of First Republic assets to JP Morgan should reduce the risk of a broader crisis in the US banking sector. Speaking after the deal was announced, JP Morgan chief executive Jamie Dimon sought to allay fears of further bank failures.4 As he noted, relatively few US banks – other than First Republic and SVB – had both very large uninsured deposit bases and significant long-duration fixed rate assets which had lost value due to the rapid increase in US interest rates. The takeover of First Republic may not mark the end of the current panic, as some of the remaining 4,500 US banks may still need additional help, and other names in the sector have subsequently come under the spotlight. But it hopefully marks the beginning of the end of concerns about the health of large US banks.
Still, we think there are five areas to monitor across the broader US banking system in the coming months amid stresses that stem from a higher interest rate environment.
Five areas to monitor across the US banking system
- Effects of lending headwinds:
Banks’ business models rely on taking in deposits and giving out loans. As a consequence of the aggressive cycle of interest rate increases by the US Federal Reserve, cash now has a value again, and many depositors want to earn the higher rates being offered by treasuries, money market funds, and other non-bank products. At the same time, quantitative tightening is acting to drain deposits from the banking system (see Exhibit 1). As a result of these factors, banks have had to pay more to secure deposits, driving their profit margins down and limiting their appetite to make loans. This potential reduction in profit margins has led to fears that last year was “as good as it gets” for US banks. From a wider perspective, the resulting tighter availability of credit could also impact the broader economy and limit the ability of firms and households to make investments.
Exhibit 1: Total deposits of US banks (USD billion)
Source: Deposits, all commercial banks. Data from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Sourced from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Data as at 2 May 2023.
- Scale of credit losses:
Defaults on bank loans – otherwise known as credit losses – have begun to creep up in recent quarters. During Covid-19, credit losses fell to historically low levels, supported by large fiscal stimulus in the initial phases of the pandemic, and then remained low as the economy re-opened, helped by low unemployment, strong wage growth, and pent-up savings from the Covid-19 era. But they are now rising, most notably in areas that can act as leading indicators of borrower stress, such as subprime car loans and credit cards. The key question is how much further will credit losses increase?
- Depth of real estate stress:
Offices represent around a quarter of total commercial real estate debt held in the US banking system. Declining office values due to increasing working-from-home and higher interest rates may cause stress for those banks that have built up large exposure to this sector relative to their size. We think credit losses for the banking system as a whole are manageable. But while the largest banks have limited exposure, some smaller banks who have been aggressive lenders to the sector may struggle in the coming years as they work through this credit cycle.
- Size of unrealised losses:
As interest rates have risen, the market value of many of the securities banks hold has fallen. Similarly, the fair value of many of their loans with fixed interest rates have declined. Many banks haven’t recognised the fair value – or mark to market – impairments in their accounts, raising some concerns about the impact on capital if these risks are realised. We don’t see this as an issue facing all banks uniformly, but it is an area that might affect some smaller regional banks.
- Risk of digital bank runs:
In a digital age, guarding against the risk of bank runs is becoming increasingly difficult. Depositors can move their cash between accounts instantly and from anywhere, while social media can allow concerns or rumours to spread quickly. Regulators and banks will need to manage the challenge of depositors potentially more prone to moving their cash.
Three bank failures in two months have shaken investor confidence in a sector key to the health of the broader economy. Overall, we think US banks face a challenging remainder of 2023. Profitability has probably peaked, compounded by a likely slowdown in loan growth and a rise in credit costs.
In the wake of these bank failures, regulators are likely to enforce stricter regulation, including requiring banks to hold more capital and subjecting a larger number of banks to more rigorous stress tests, that will further pressure returns. The swift actions of regulators have helped to reduce the risk of a broader crisis, and JP Morgan’s rescue of First Republic hopefully marks the end, or at least the beginning of the end, of this phase of the crisis.
But US depositors and investors are more nervous about the safety of banks than they have been in more than a decade. Investors can use the factors above as a guide for potential signals of future stress.
1 Source: FRB Earnings Release Q1 2023 (firstrepublic.com). Excludes $30bn deposit made by consortium of other banks during March 2023.
2 Source: FDIC: PR-34-2023 5/1/2023
3 Source: Jamie Dimon to investors: ‘This part of the crisis is over’ | Fortune
4 Source: Jamie Dimon to investors: ‘This part of the crisis is over’ | Fortune
Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.
This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is for Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations and is for information purpose only. This document does not constitute a public offer by virtue of Act Number 26.831 of the Argentine Republic and General Resolution No. 622/2013 of the NSC. This communication's sole purpose is to inform and does not under any circumstance constitute promotion or publicity of Allianz Global Investors products and/or services in Colombia or to Colombian residents pursuant to part 4 of Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication does not in any way aim to directly or indirectly initiate the purchase of a product or the provision of a service offered by Allianz Global Investors. Via reception of his document, each resident in Colombia acknowledges and accepts to have contacted Allianz Global Investors via their own initiative and that the communication under no circumstances does not arise from any promotional or marketing activities carried out by Allianz Global Investors. Colombian residents accept that accessing any type of social network page of Allianz Global Investors is done under their own responsibility and initiative and are aware that they may access specific information on the products and services of Allianz Global Investors. This communication is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced. This communication does not constitute a public offer of securities in Colombia pursuant to the public offer regulation set forth in Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication and the information provided herein should not be considered a solicitation or an offer by Allianz Global Investors or its affiliates to provide any financial products in Brazil, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional/professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws.
This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG; in HK, by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore, by Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; in Japan, by Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424], Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association, the Investment Trust Association, Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; in Taiwan, by Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan; and in Indonesia, by PT. Allianz Global Investors Asset Management Indonesia licensed by Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).