The Big Question

Is it time to review my currency hedging strategy?

Investing outside your home market can open up new opportunities. But it may also create challenges from fluctuating exchange rates. We see three ways to hedge currency risks.

Currency risks arise from gains or losses in investments due to changes in the value of one currency against another (typically, the currency in the foreign market where you are investing versus your home currency).

And we think such risks are rising up the agenda for many investors. One reason is that many big economies increasingly move at different paces. Interest rates – one factor in determining exchange rates – are less synchronised than they have tended to be, as central banks adjust rates to suit the changing needs of their economies. Geopolitics – which have loomed large over markets in recent years – can also influence exchange rates.

So, what can you do to mitigate currency risk?

Currency hedging can improve the predictability of results – ensuring an investment portfolio is protected from unforeseen shocks.

We see three ways to hedge currency risks:

Currency hedging via forwards

Hedging a foreign currency position using forward contracts has long been a popular choice for managing foreign exchange (FX) risk in a portfolio. Currency forwards are deals in the FX market that guarantee a certain exchange rate for the purchase or sale of a currency at an agreed date. They can be tailored to a particular amount and maturity. And they can help mitigate volatility in the currency being hedged. Some investors choose a 100% static forward strategy, meaning they hedge their entire foreign currency position and are then only able to rebalance it at the maturity of the forward contract. That may prove risky if exchange rates are volatile.

And currency forwards carry other downside risks. They can be associated with high hedging costs, depending on the difference in the interest rate between your home market and an overseas market. This differential has, for example, become particularly challenging for anyone in the euro zone investing in US assets. Interest rates in the US have been significantly higher than in the euro zone, and the differential is even wider between Japan and the US. As a result, there can be a significant cost to hedging a US dollar position from overseas. Over time, such fixed costs may diminish expected returns (see Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1: Hedging costs of a US dollar position for one year using 100% forwards
Exhibit 1: Hedging costs of a US dollar position for one year using 100% forwards

Data as at 31 December 2023. Source: Bloomberg. The hypothetical cost development presented is for illustrative purposes only and does not reflect actual cost development; they are not a reliable indicator of future results.

Currency hedging via put options

A simple alternative may be an FX put option, offering potential protection from currency movements. Currency put options offer an opportunity – but not the obligation – to sell a specific amount of a foreign currency at a predetermined price once currency losses move above a predetermined level. The price of a put option is affected by factors ranging from the specific price the currency is sold at (known as the strike price), the timeframe of the intended protection, interest rates and market implied volatility. A put option increases in value as the price of the underlying currency decreases. But it loses its value as the price of the underlying currency increases.

We think put options may be preferable to currency hedging via forwards as they offer greater flexibility, providing potential protection against downward moves in the hedged currency as well as participation in any gains. If a currency move is unfavourable, there’s no obligation to trade at the maturity of the contract. In contrast, currency forwards are binding, so there is no way to terminate the contract.

The flexibility provided by put options may also have a diversifying effect on the underlying investment as the portfolio can benefit from any sharp increase in the hedged currency. Such moves are common for the US dollar at times of market stress and put options can serve to reduce overall risk during these times.

But put options have the disadvantage of high hedging costs. Options can be particularly pricey when exchange rates are stable as the premium for payment at the contract’s maturity date will be higher.

Currency hedging via collars

Collar strategies help to manage currency risk by limiting exposure to swings in FX rates to within a certain range. They comprise two option contracts, which combined can be a cost-effective alternative to using put option trades alone:

  • A put option offering the right to sell a foreign currency at the strike price within a specific time period. As noted above, the put option provides protection against possible downward moves in the hedged currency, while providing the opportunity to benefit from any upward moves. For collar strategies, we would buy the put option.
  • A call option offering the right to buy a foreign currency at a specified price (the strike price) within a specific time period. We would sell the call option using the premium to lower the cost of the protection. In case the hedged currency moves up, the return will be capped by the strike price.
Need to know

Q. What are put and call options?
A. Put and call options allow buyers to take a particular action on an underlying asset (such as a currency) in the future if it benefits them. But there’s a difference in what they both permit. A put option gives the buyer the right – but not the obligation – to sell a particular asset at the strike price within an agreed time frame. A call option allows the buyer the right – but not the obligation – to buy a particular asset at the strike price within an agreed time frame. Investors purchase put options when they think the price of the underlying asset will drop and sell if they believe it will rise. They would buy call options when they think the price of the underlying asset will rise and sell if they believe it will drop.

The collar structure has all the benefits of the put option. It profits from any gains in the exchange rate and limits the downside risk but can be set up without paying the high premium for the put option. The collar structure takes advantage of generally higher premiums for call options on currencies, compared to the generally lower put premiums. In other words, you can often even get a profit from selling the call option and buying the put option when you choose the same protection and upside potential for the put and the call.

In fact, the ratio of the call to put premium has been relatively stable over the last 20 years, providing a favourable backdrop for hedging. Additionally, the strategy may profit from any rise in the hedged currency up to the strike price of the call.

Hedging with collars can be more expensive than using currency forwards in years of strong downward movement of the hedged currency. The additional cost is limited by the difference between the protection level and interest rate differential. But using collars is cheaper in environments where the hedged currency is moving sideways, slightly down or up. Overall, collar strategies provide lower hedge costs over the longer term compared to a 100% forward hedge as long as the interest rate difference is positive in favour of the hedged currency.

Which approach may be best for your portfolio?

Hedging can be a sensible way to manage currency risk. It is important to consider a range of factors when determining the best approach for your needs, including the FX spot rate and the interest rate differential, as well as levels of volatility and liquidity in the currency markets.

In general, for longer-term investors, we think option strategies may be the smartest solution: they help to reduce risk and costs more effectively and efficiently than forwards. This can mean a significantly improved Sharpe ratio, a measure of volatility-adjusted returns.

To demonstrate, we created a hypothetical standard asset allocation of fixed income, equities and hedge fund investments, with 65% of the assets denominated in US dollars. We then analysed how the portfolio may perform based on different approaches to hedging across realised volatility, average annual return, and risk-adjusted return. In all cases, the collar approach provided the best results (see Exhibit 2).

In an environment where currency volatility might be a bigger feature of investment markets, it could be a good time to review the currency risk in your portfolio and how to manage it most effectively.

Exhibit 2: Collar strategies can produce potentially better results than 100% forward structures
Exhibit 2: Collar strategies can produce potentially better results than 100% forward structures

Source: Bloomberg. Trading costs are not taken into account. The hypothetical performance and simulations presented are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect actual performance; they are not a reliable indicator of future results.

  • Disclaimer
    Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is for Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations and is for information purpose only. This document does not constitute a public offer by virtue of Act Number 26.831 of the Argentine Republic and General Resolution No. 622/2013 of the NSC. This communication’s sole purpose is to inform and does not under any circumstance constitute promotion or publicity of Allianz Global Investors products and/or services in Colombia or to Colombian residents pursuant to part 4 of Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication does not in any way aim to directly or indirectly initiate the purchase of a product or the provision of a service offered by Allianz Global Investors. Via reception of his document, each resident in Colombia acknowledges and accepts to have contacted Allianz Global Investors via their own initiative and that the communication under no circumstances does not arise from any promotional or marketing activities carried out by Allianz Global Investors. Colombian residents accept that accessing any type of social network page of Allianz Global Investors is done under their own responsibility and initiative and are aware that they may access specific information on the products and services of Allianz Global Investors. This communication is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced, except for the case of explicit permission by Allianz Global Investors. This communication does not constitute a public offer of securities in Colombia pursuant to the public offer regulation set forth in Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication and the information provided herein should not be considered a solicitation or an offer by Allianz Global Investors or its affiliates to provide any financial products in Brazil, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional/professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws.This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG; Allianz Global Investors UK Limited, authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in HK, by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore, by Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; in Japan, by Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424], Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association, the Investment Trust Association, Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; in Taiwan, by Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan; and in Indonesia, by PT. Allianz Global Investors Asset Management Indonesia licensed by Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).

    3661440

Recent insights

One of the defining features of equity markets over recent years has been extremely high levels of index concentration, with the so-called “Magnificent Seven” making up around a third of the total market capitalization of the S&P 500.

Discover more

Achieving Sustainability

COP 29 closed amid comparisons with an equally acrimonious COP 15 in 2009. The tripling of climate finance commitments merely masks heightened tensions between developed and developing nations, evident ambition gaps, and ongoing absence of detail. In short, the COP format appears increasingly unable to match the ambitions of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Discover more

With megatrends like Artificial Intelligence and ‘digital Darwinism’ disrupting the business landscape, the Technology sector is poised to remain a key driver for equity markets and a crucial element in client portfolios in the decades to come.

Discover more

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.